Skip to main content

WHAT WERE THEY THINKING?

First things first, here is India’s 17 member squad for the three match Test series in South Africa with the first test beginning from the 5th of January, 2018 at Cape Town .
Virat Kohli (captain), Murali Vijay, KL Rahul, Shikhar Dhawan, Cheteshwar Pujara, Ajinkya Rahane (vice captain), Rohit Sharma, Ravinder Jadeja, Wriddhiman Saha (wicket keeper), Ravichanadran Ashwin, Parthiv Patel (reserve wicket keeper), Hardik Pandya, Bhuvneshwar Kumar, Ishant Sharma, Jasprit Bumrah, Mohammad Sami and Umesh Yadav.
When I failed to spot either of Kuldeep Yadav or Yuzvendra Chahal in the list of players selected while I scanned through the squad a second time, a question spurred in my mind, what were the selectors thinking? Or for that matter, what was Virat and the think tank’s reasoning behind this absurd decision. I understand selecting a team is solely the selector’s responsibility, but still, I am sure Virat would have been consulted prior to the finalizing of the squad. Why not take, if not both then at least even one, of the most successful bowlers, in the shorter formats during the last six months or so, only behind Bhuvneshwar Kumar and Jasprit Bumrah, and still persist with Ravichanadran Ashwin and Ravinder Jadeja.
I understand, we are taking Test cricket here, and the conditions in South Africa will not be conducive to spin bowling, which I believe was the precise reason for us to take one if not both the bowlers, as firstly, they are both wrist spinners which gives them the added advantage of spinning the ball on most surfaces, and secondly, they have an degree of unknown associated to them as they have not yet played that much international cricket. But alas! What do the three wise men and the chief selector of BCCI along with the team think tank do? They go with the easy decision, as it takes nerve to firstly make a tough decision and then secondly stick with it to face any eventuality.
I must make it clear, that I am not anti Ravichanadran Ashwin or Ravinder Jadeja, but my point is they have not been successful abroad in the past, so what makes the selectors so sure that this time will be any different. For finger spinners like them to be successful they need assistance from pitches which sadly they will not be able to garner from the surfaces they will be provided in South Africa. Another point is that Virat will not be able to use them in a defensive strategy of curtailing the run, as the truer pitches of South Africa will not cut slack for half-decent bowling, like sometimes which happens in the slow and low pitches of the subcontinent where an ordinary spinner gets away with some loose stuff. Over there on the South African pitches you either bowl wicket taking deliveries or you keep chasing leather all day long. And if the selectors are justify their decision by providing Ashwin and Jadeja’s usefulness with the bat coming lower down the order, I rebuke that line of reasoning by stating that, runs only keep you in the match, while it is the ability to take twenty wickets that win test matches.   
I believe we have missed a trick in ignoring and leaving behind, two of our most potent wicket taking weapons; as, Kuldeep Yadav, with his ability to spin the ball prodigiously and the mystery associated with him of being a china-man bowler, and Yuzvendra Chahal, who does not spin the ball that much, as say a Kuldeep Yadav, but being a leg spinner has a bag full of tricks, whose rawness and guile could have come in hand to fox the South African batsman.
As things stand, I am sure the South African batsman are not shaking in their boots, as they know what to expect from Ashwin and Jadeja, sadly not much in terms of spin I suppose. Or do the selectors and the team think tank have an ace up their sleeve, and plan to employ an all out pace attack?   
I ponder!

Comments

  1. I vote for chaal...rather than yadav. He is a clever bowler.

    ReplyDelete
  2. And I do agree with your point of getting 20 wickets.... It's not the runs. So a team has to be sure that they need 5 mainline bowlers.
    I remember once Pakistan team has taken such a bold step against Razzaq. He was on his peak performance but they made him rest. And on asking why in hell they took this decision? They replied, that they need a wicket taking bowler not a batsman who can bowl.
    I still admire Pakistani selectors for such clear mind.
    I think India should also start focusing on bowlers as well. From so many years they are just considering batsman as their main moto.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shanu, I concur with your thinking. And thank you for your feedback.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

WILL THE REAL CRICKETERS PLEASE STAND UP

“After we finished the West Indies tour and went to South Africa in 2013 that was a challenge. If I am not wrong after that we went to England, New Zealand and Australia and we knew that was going to be a challenge with the big names retiring," Rohit Sharma told reporters before leaving for Sri Lanka. "We played some good cricket in Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, so I am sure this unit will do well in Sri Lanka. Our challenge will be to win all the three Test matches there and comeback as champions," Rahane said echoing Rohit’s thoughts. Indian bowling coach Bharat Arun carrying on the team baton stated that speed merchants Varun Aaron and Umesh Yadav will take up the challenge to “maintain speed as well as be accurate.” “You don’t come to the ground to draw a match, so you play a brand of cricket where you take the game forward. The role I play is hammering that into their system. We don’t mind losing playing in that fashion. But it is the bra...

AND THE SEMIFINALISTS WILL BE...

What a master class Virat Kohli served-up; the poise in character, the mental toughness and the sheer willingness to fight. That an emotional Virat himself acknowledged and placed the inning, as his top right now. The significant word here is emotional; as he very well knows that the real tournament starts now. As with New Zealand, England and West Indies we have three very dangerous sides very much capable of winning the trophy.  Let’s start with the second semi final between hosts India and West Indies taking place at Mumbai on 31st March 2016, India can ill afford to take their opponents lightly as the shortest format of cricket suits their player’s six hitting capabilities, couple that with the technical know-how of countering Indian slow and low spin friendly pitches which they learned by plying their trade in the IPL (Indian Premier League.) With Chris Gayle’s powerful hitting, Dwayne Bravo’s cutters, Samuel Badree and Suliem...

THE DISPARITY BETWEEN THE DOMINANT BAT AND THE HUMBLE BALL

The International Cricket Council (ICC) must get its act-together otherwise, the game which we love and respect so much starts to lose credibility. One look at the truck loads of runs Virat Kohli and Steve Smith, are piling on, the admirer, the passionate supporter and the fan of cricket in me falls short of words for the praise their feat richly deserves. Virat Kohli’s five double hundreds in a calendar year the highest by any captain and the ease by which Steve Smith keep scoring big and important runs in the ongoing 2017, Ashes (incidentally, at the time of writing this article, the third test at Perth is in progress, and Smith is 200+ not out overnight) compels me think, about the level these two players have already reached, and my mind immediately starts to compare them with game’s best of all time like Sir Don Bradman and Sachin Tendulkar. I know that it is a folly to compare greats of different generations, as those times were different, so are the present times. My...