Skip to main content

WHAT WERE THEY THINKING?

First things first, here is India’s 17 member squad for the three match Test series in South Africa with the first test beginning from the 5th of January, 2018 at Cape Town .
Virat Kohli (captain), Murali Vijay, KL Rahul, Shikhar Dhawan, Cheteshwar Pujara, Ajinkya Rahane (vice captain), Rohit Sharma, Ravinder Jadeja, Wriddhiman Saha (wicket keeper), Ravichanadran Ashwin, Parthiv Patel (reserve wicket keeper), Hardik Pandya, Bhuvneshwar Kumar, Ishant Sharma, Jasprit Bumrah, Mohammad Sami and Umesh Yadav.
When I failed to spot either of Kuldeep Yadav or Yuzvendra Chahal in the list of players selected while I scanned through the squad a second time, a question spurred in my mind, what were the selectors thinking? Or for that matter, what was Virat and the think tank’s reasoning behind this absurd decision. I understand selecting a team is solely the selector’s responsibility, but still, I am sure Virat would have been consulted prior to the finalizing of the squad. Why not take, if not both then at least even one, of the most successful bowlers, in the shorter formats during the last six months or so, only behind Bhuvneshwar Kumar and Jasprit Bumrah, and still persist with Ravichanadran Ashwin and Ravinder Jadeja.
I understand, we are taking Test cricket here, and the conditions in South Africa will not be conducive to spin bowling, which I believe was the precise reason for us to take one if not both the bowlers, as firstly, they are both wrist spinners which gives them the added advantage of spinning the ball on most surfaces, and secondly, they have an degree of unknown associated to them as they have not yet played that much international cricket. But alas! What do the three wise men and the chief selector of BCCI along with the team think tank do? They go with the easy decision, as it takes nerve to firstly make a tough decision and then secondly stick with it to face any eventuality.
I must make it clear, that I am not anti Ravichanadran Ashwin or Ravinder Jadeja, but my point is they have not been successful abroad in the past, so what makes the selectors so sure that this time will be any different. For finger spinners like them to be successful they need assistance from pitches which sadly they will not be able to garner from the surfaces they will be provided in South Africa. Another point is that Virat will not be able to use them in a defensive strategy of curtailing the run, as the truer pitches of South Africa will not cut slack for half-decent bowling, like sometimes which happens in the slow and low pitches of the subcontinent where an ordinary spinner gets away with some loose stuff. Over there on the South African pitches you either bowl wicket taking deliveries or you keep chasing leather all day long. And if the selectors are justify their decision by providing Ashwin and Jadeja’s usefulness with the bat coming lower down the order, I rebuke that line of reasoning by stating that, runs only keep you in the match, while it is the ability to take twenty wickets that win test matches.   
I believe we have missed a trick in ignoring and leaving behind, two of our most potent wicket taking weapons; as, Kuldeep Yadav, with his ability to spin the ball prodigiously and the mystery associated with him of being a china-man bowler, and Yuzvendra Chahal, who does not spin the ball that much, as say a Kuldeep Yadav, but being a leg spinner has a bag full of tricks, whose rawness and guile could have come in hand to fox the South African batsman.
As things stand, I am sure the South African batsman are not shaking in their boots, as they know what to expect from Ashwin and Jadeja, sadly not much in terms of spin I suppose. Or do the selectors and the team think tank have an ace up their sleeve, and plan to employ an all out pace attack?   
I ponder!

Comments

  1. I vote for chaal...rather than yadav. He is a clever bowler.

    ReplyDelete
  2. And I do agree with your point of getting 20 wickets.... It's not the runs. So a team has to be sure that they need 5 mainline bowlers.
    I remember once Pakistan team has taken such a bold step against Razzaq. He was on his peak performance but they made him rest. And on asking why in hell they took this decision? They replied, that they need a wicket taking bowler not a batsman who can bowl.
    I still admire Pakistani selectors for such clear mind.
    I think India should also start focusing on bowlers as well. From so many years they are just considering batsman as their main moto.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shanu, I concur with your thinking. And thank you for your feedback.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RISE AND RISE OF BANGLADESH CRICKET

No eye was raised when Bangladesh took a 78 runs first innings lead in the recently concluded rain affected drawn out test match against South Africa at Chittagong. Actually it was a reality which every Bangladeshi cricket fan willed to happen sooner rather than later. Individual and one off heroic performances were the norm but it was being consistent as a team day in day out, match after match, carrying performance from one format to the other and building on the success were Bangladesh cricket frailties. All that had changed as Bangladesh cricket is finally looking up after a string of successes in ODI’s against Pakistan, India and South Africa. The Bangladesh one-day juggernaut which started with the win over Zimbabwe has now slain South Africa 2-1. Win is a win , the old adage doesn’t do justice as the complete domination exhibited, audacity of play and knuckling down in pressure situation to fight it out emphasis the level of growth to which Bangladesh cricket has rise

AND THE SEMIFINALISTS WILL BE...

What a master class Virat Kohli served-up; the poise in character, the mental toughness and the sheer willingness to fight. That an emotional Virat himself acknowledged and placed the inning, as his top right now. The significant word here is emotional; as he very well knows that the real tournament starts now. As with New Zealand, England and West Indies we have three very dangerous sides very much capable of winning the trophy.  Let’s start with the second semi final between hosts India and West Indies taking place at Mumbai on 31st March 2016, India can ill afford to take their opponents lightly as the shortest format of cricket suits their player’s six hitting capabilities, couple that with the technical know-how of countering Indian slow and low spin friendly pitches which they learned by plying their trade in the IPL (Indian Premier League.) With Chris Gayle’s powerful hitting, Dwayne Bravo’s cutters, Samuel Badree and Sulieman Benn’s guile and Andre Russell’s all roun

INDIAN TEST CRICKET AND FAST BOWLING

There was a time when Indian cricket craved for genuine pace bowlers truth be told it had its share of quick bowlers the likes of Javagal Srinath, Zaheer Khan, Ashish Nehra and Ajit Agarkar. But the fixation of selectors and cricket fans with a bowler with raw pace was so overwhelming that each and every upcoming bowler was put through the magnifying glass. The diligence paid off and with the emergence of Umesh Yadav, Mohammad Shami and Varun Arun for the first time India boasted of fast bowlers clocking 145+ kmps on regular basis. There was a sense of euphoria in India with the understanding that batsmen world over will hop on deliveries bowled by Indian bowlers and they can  for the first time give back what their batsmen have been getting all along. The bubble of expectation bursts after India’s 2-0 loss in the 2014-2015 tour of Australia. The loss was more hurting as the young Indian batsmen matched up against the Australian pace battery and succeeded in posting respectable