First things first, here is India’s 17 member squad
for the three match Test series in South Africa with the first test beginning from
the 5th of January, 2018 at Cape Town .
Virat
Kohli (captain), Murali Vijay, KL Rahul, Shikhar Dhawan, Cheteshwar Pujara,
Ajinkya Rahane (vice captain), Rohit Sharma, Ravinder Jadeja, Wriddhiman Saha
(wicket keeper), Ravichanadran Ashwin, Parthiv Patel (reserve wicket keeper),
Hardik Pandya, Bhuvneshwar Kumar, Ishant Sharma, Jasprit Bumrah, Mohammad Sami and
Umesh Yadav.
When I failed to spot either of Kuldeep Yadav or
Yuzvendra Chahal in the list of players selected while I scanned through the
squad a second time, a question spurred in my mind, what were the selectors thinking? Or for that matter, what was
Virat and the think tank’s reasoning behind this absurd decision. I understand
selecting a team is solely the selector’s responsibility, but still, I am sure
Virat would have been consulted prior to the finalizing of the squad. Why not
take, if not both then at least even one, of the most successful bowlers, in
the shorter formats during the last six months or so, only behind Bhuvneshwar
Kumar and Jasprit Bumrah, and still persist with Ravichanadran Ashwin and
Ravinder Jadeja.
I understand, we are taking Test cricket here, and
the conditions in South Africa will not be conducive to spin bowling, which I believe
was the precise reason for us to take one if not both the bowlers, as firstly,
they are both wrist spinners which gives them the added advantage of spinning
the ball on most surfaces, and secondly, they have an degree of unknown
associated to them as they have not yet played that much international cricket.
But alas! What do the three wise men and the chief selector of BCCI along with
the team think tank do? They go with the easy decision, as it takes nerve to
firstly make a tough decision and then secondly stick with it to face any
eventuality.
I must make it clear, that I am not anti
Ravichanadran Ashwin or Ravinder Jadeja, but my point is they have not been
successful abroad in the past, so what makes the selectors so sure that this
time will be any different. For finger spinners like them to be successful they
need assistance from pitches which sadly they will not be able to garner from the
surfaces they will be provided in South Africa. Another point is that Virat
will not be able to use them in a defensive strategy of curtailing the run, as
the truer pitches of South Africa will not cut slack for half-decent bowling,
like sometimes which happens in the slow and low pitches of the subcontinent where
an ordinary spinner gets away with some loose stuff. Over there on the South
African pitches you either bowl wicket taking deliveries or you keep chasing
leather all day long. And if the selectors are justify their decision by
providing Ashwin and Jadeja’s usefulness with the bat coming lower down the
order, I rebuke that line of reasoning by stating that, runs only keep you in
the match, while it is the ability to take twenty wickets that win test
matches.
I believe we have missed a trick in ignoring and
leaving behind, two of our most potent wicket taking weapons; as, Kuldeep Yadav,
with his ability to spin the ball prodigiously and the mystery associated with
him of being a china-man bowler, and Yuzvendra Chahal, who does not spin the
ball that much, as say a Kuldeep Yadav, but being a leg spinner has a bag full
of tricks, whose rawness and guile could have come in hand to fox the South
African batsman.
As things stand, I am sure the South African
batsman are not shaking in their boots, as they know what to expect from Ashwin
and Jadeja, sadly not much in terms of spin I suppose. Or do the selectors and
the team think tank have an ace up their sleeve, and plan to employ an all out
pace attack?
I
ponder!
I vote for chaal...rather than yadav. He is a clever bowler.
ReplyDelete*Chahal
ReplyDeleteAnd I do agree with your point of getting 20 wickets.... It's not the runs. So a team has to be sure that they need 5 mainline bowlers.
ReplyDeleteI remember once Pakistan team has taken such a bold step against Razzaq. He was on his peak performance but they made him rest. And on asking why in hell they took this decision? They replied, that they need a wicket taking bowler not a batsman who can bowl.
I still admire Pakistani selectors for such clear mind.
I think India should also start focusing on bowlers as well. From so many years they are just considering batsman as their main moto.
Shanu, I concur with your thinking. And thank you for your feedback.
Delete